Even if one isn’t a football fan or an NFL fan, most of America is aware that 2016 is the year of Super Bowl 50. A golden anniversary is always historic, and with an entity as popular as the National Football League, the hype for the game has been present since the beginning of the season. With the way the regular season and the postseason played out, Sunday should mark a celebration of the game of football, and NFL execs hope a celebration of the league as well.

Either the Carolina Panthers or the Denver Broncos will have the distinction of lifting the Lombardi Trophy on Sunday night. The Panthers have only been a franchise for two decades, but this is their second trip to the big game, having come close on several other occasions, too. Boasting the league’s best record and what seems like the runaway choice for MVP in Cam Newton, Carolina may be regarded favorites to win. However, Denver is the sentimental favorite; they have veteran quarterback Peyton Manning, who is likely to retire after the game, win or lose. The Broncos sent John Elway out as a two-time Super Bowl champion; Manning already has one ring with the Indianapolis Colts, and has two disappointing losses in Super Bowls XLIV & XLVIII. A win Sunday will end any doubts of how his legacy should be regarded.

It’s an important day for CBS too, as the broadcaster for Super Bowl 50. The current TV agreement involves all three network NFL broadcasters airing the Super Bowl every three years, and 2016 just happens to be the turn of CBS. No doubt Fox or NBC would treat the occasion the same way, but with CBS being one of the channels that broadcast Super Bowl I (NBC did as well, with a separate announcing crew), it will be a day everyone with that network will remember. Jim Nantz will call his fourth Super Bowl since becoming the #1 play-by-play man for their NFL coverage, and while some say he’s better as a golf announcer, he has definitely grown in his knowledge of the NFL.

Will Super Bowl 50 live up to the hype? Only a few days until fans find out the answer.

The 2016 Australian Open ended Sunday in Melbourne with a familiar outcome: Novak Djokovic winning the men’s singles championship. The world number one continued his dominance of the game, and particularly his dominance of Melbourne Park, with a straight-set win over Andy Murray, in a rematch from the 2015 final. It’s the Serbian’s sixth Australian Open title, and his fifth in six years.

Sunday’s match was a reverse of sorts when compared to the 2015 meeting between Djokovic and Murray. Last year, Murray fought hard early, taking the first sets to tiebreaks and winning the second. However, Djokovic proved too strong in the third and fourth sets, barely needing half an hour to close out the fourth set 6-0. This year, the top seed cruised in the first set, before winning the second and third sets 7-5 7-6.

While Andy Murray is considered one of the “Big Four” in tennis – along with Djokovic, Roger Federer, and Rafael Nadal – he has struggled to win major tournaments. He does have two titles – the 2012 U.S. Open and Wimbledon the following summer, but has often fallen short against his “Big Four” rivals. Part of this has to do with the others excelling on certain surfaces; Djokovic has mastered hardcourts with his success in Australia and the United States, while Nadal has often been called king of clay (the surface for the French Open), and Federer has mastered grass for more than a decade. Murray is stuck in an unfortunate scenario where he happens to be competing alongside three of the greatest players in men’s tennis history. In another era, he’d be the revered figure of the sport.

What’s next for Novak Djokovic? He turns 29 in May, around the time Roland Garros will start. The French Open is the only major he has yet to win, having fallen in the final each of the past two years. If 2016 is to be the year where Djokovic completes the career Grand Slam, he’ll have plenty of challenges to face in Paris.

Will Djokovic win the French Open and finish a career Slam? Leave a comment below!

Although football is the most popular sport by far in West Virginia, basketball is not far down the list of relevance. Its position largely depends on the strength of the state’s two Division I programs – West Virginia and Marshall – and the typical highs and lows that any college program endures.

Earlier this month, West Virginia was in the national spotlight thanks to the way their schedule aligned, facing #1 Kansas on a Tuesday and then visiting #2 Oklahoma the following Saturday. After a confident performance over the Jayhawks, the Mountaineers took the Sooners to the wire in Norman, before the hosts prevailed on a late tip-in. WVU is part of a tie for the Big 12 lead as the season heads into the final two months before Selection Sunday.

As January comes to a close, Marshall is now entering similar circumstances. The Thundering Herd won in convincing fashion Thursday night over Middle Tennessee, in a battle of teams that began the game tied for 2nd in Conference USA. Not long after that matchup went final, UAB suffered a shock loss to Western Kentucky, meaning the Blazers and Thundering Herd are now tied for the league lead. The two teams will meet each other Saturday in Huntington, West Virginia.

It’s been a remarkable turnaround for Marshall, in their second year under former playing legend Dan D’Antoni. Expectations were hopeful for an improvement from 2014-15, but after an exhibition loss to Division II Newberry, the Thundering Herd dropped their first six regular season contests. Whatever woes they faced in non-conference play, however, have quickly disappeared with the start of Conference USA play. Five straight wins to open league play have quickly brought attention to the program, and even a loss at Charlotte was not enough to slow the momentum. James Kelly has established as an early favorite for C-USA Player of the Year, with several Player of the Week honors already this season.

Saturday’s game against the Blazers presents a major opportunity that Marshall can show they’re a team to be taken seriously. With CBS Sports Network airing the game nationwide, expect an energized team performance as first place in the conference is up for grabs. It will also serve as a notice for how the Herd’s remaining games play out. Will a loss commence a disappointing season’s end or can they win and keep the impressive momentum going?

It’s been several days since England cricket finished the Test portion of its South Africa tour, and when one solely looks at the results, the visitors had a successful Test series. Not only did the Lions win the series 2-1, but South Africa faced the humiliation of losing the #1 Test ranking on their own soil, exactly what England endured when they last hosted South Africa. That the Proteas avoided further disaster by winning the fourth Test will provide some consolation, but how much going forward?

First, a word on the importance of this cricket rivalry, as these teams have much in common when it comes to cricket. They compete for the Basil D’Oliveira Trophy, named after the legendary English cricketer born in South Africa. He was originally in the England squad when they were scheduled to tour the Rainbow Nation in the late 1960s, but the tour was scrapped because of the controversy surrounding South Africa’s refusal to play; D’Oliveira was viewed as “coloured” in the apartheid system. Many other prominent English cricketers have come from South Africa, including Andrew Strauss and Kevin Pietersen.

As for the Test series that just concluded, England seemed to be well in control throughout each of the first three Tests, even with Dale Steyn bowling well on the first day of the series. South Africa had bright spots from Dean Elgar, Temba Bavuma, and Kagiso Rabada, among others, but the visitors are worthy series winners. Now the problem is how to close out series in style.

This has been a problem for England in recent Test series. After reclaiming the Ashes against Australia with one match to spare, the hosts chose to send many of their first team, hoping to finish the series with a 4-1 win. However, Australia played with emotion as it was the final Test for captain Michael Clarke. In South Africa, the Proteas also played with desire – and perhaps desperation – to avoid a 3-0 series loss, and that played a part in England’s tame second innings of 101 at Centurion.

Next up in the tour is the ODI series, the first match set for Bloemfontein on Wednesday. The Englishmen who are playing in both the Tests and ODIs know the work ahead of them in terms of repairing their reputations, and will embrace the opportunity to get another series win on the road. As for those who only play Tests nowadays (Alastair Cook, James Anderson, for example), they’ll have to wait four months before Sri Lanka comes to England. It will be interesting to see if they can learn what’s pivotal to closing out a Test series.

By Manchester United’s standards, 2014 was a disappointing calendar year for the English Premier League club. 2015 went only slightly better, but the club went through the entire month of December without a win, crashing out of the Champions League, a competition where the Red Devils were considered perennial title contenders not long ago.

2016 has started much better for the club, especially when one solely looks at the results. They began with a win over Swansea, before needing a late penalty to see off Sheffield United in the third round of the FA Cup – the stage where all EPL & Championship clubs enter the competition. It wasn’t a convincing performance by any means, but in the Cup’s single-elimination format, any kind of win will do. United followed that result with an entertaining 3-3 draw at Newcastle; the Red Devils were unlucky to not get all three points, but they did get three against Liverpool, in a rivalry where results always matter, regardless of the teams’ fortune in a given season.

Saturday, however, brought a 1-0 loss at Old Trafford to Southampton, in a game where United seemed bored and uninterested in winning. Fans are casting much of the blame at manager Louis van Gaal, who has drawn criticism for his dull style of play at Old Trafford. Players are reportedly just as frustrated as the fans, and following Saturday’s loss the manager said supporters were right to boo him. This pattern has been going on for several months this season, with the Dutchman once admitting earlier in the campaign that he is concerned about job security. However, when asked a similar question Saturday, he gave a defiant No comment-esque reply. The question seems to be will United management let van Gaal see out the rest of the season, or will they make a change mid-year just like they did with David Moyes two years ago?

The other debate is who would replace van Gaal as the full-time manager. Former legend Ryan Giggs has been serving as an assistant, and many supporters would like to see him in charge one day, but the Welshman may want to consider taking a job at a lower-level club and work his way up before becoming the manager at Old Trafford. It’s no secret that Jose Mourinho has long wanted United’s manager; in another world, he would have succeeded Sir Alex Ferguson in 2013. This weekend, the Portuguese wrote a six-page letter detailing how his desire to manage United hasn’t wavered, and how he’d be willing to abandon his “park the bus” tactics in favor of the club’s traditional attacking style of play.

Manchester United is next in action at Derby County in the fourth round of the FA Cup. A win there would not only end United’s nasty recent habit of early Cup exits in even-numbered years, but could persuade management to let Louis van Gaal at least finish out the season. That mentality could change depending on how the club performs in February – including the Europa League tie with Midtjylland – but right now all eyes are on the matchup with the Rams.

Do you think Louis van Gaal will be sacked before the season’s end? Leave a comment below!

Those in Switzerland look to Roger Federer. Those in Spain look to Rafael Nadal. Depending on the generation, those in the United States, looked to John McEnroe, or Pete Sampras and Andre Agassi. Most nations have produced tennis idols for compatriots to root for with little difficulty, as very few players in the sport personify a “villain” role on purpose, let alone embrace it. For Australians, their most popular tennis player this century has been Lleyton Hewitt, whose singles career ended Thursday with a loss to David Ferrer.

Hewitt represented a new form of tennis role model for Australians in the way that John Newcombe, Rod Laver, and others had for previous generations. He didn’t possess any sort of brash behavior or arrogance that would’ve made him a “love-to-hate” figure for American or European followers. He did, though, have a signature look wearing a baseball cap backwards with long hair, making him recognizable to most casual fans.

On the court, he may not have been the most decorated tennis player in history, but did well enough to win two majors – the U.S. Open in 2001 and Wimbledon the following summer. He reached the finals of two more Grand Slams – the 2004 U.S. Open and 2005 Australian Open. While he could never win his home Grand Slam, he remained, and will continue to remain, a hero of Australian sport.

Thursday’s second round match against David Ferrer represented a celebration of sorts for the Adelaide native. Hewitt provided multiple classic shots while donning a baseball cap worn backwards, even though the long hair is long gone. In the end, however, Ferrer showed even though he’s not much younger, the Spaniard is in the form of his life, cruising to the third round in straight sets. Recognizing the importance of the moment, however, Ferrer was extremely cordial to Hewitt, at some times apologetic during his post-match interview that he had to be the one who ended Hewitt’s singles career.

Australian Open executives handled the occasion brilliantly, as well. Usually it’s the winner who speaks last, but Hewitt had the last word, while a tribute video from current giants like Federer, Nadal, and Andy Murray congratulated the two-time major champion. ESPN3’s feed also showed a poignant moment of Hewitt walking out of Rod Laver Arena with his three children, through the walkway to the locker room, with a closing shot of his likeness on a door with the phrase, “Thanks, Mate!”

Lleyton Hewitt is still in the men’s doubles competition; he and fellow Aussie Sam Groth will face Henri Kontinen & John Peers in the second round Saturday. But he’s more remembered for his feats in singles play, where the future looks bright for Australian men. Two of the nation’s biggest up-and-comers – Nick Kyrgios and Bernard Tomic – have already worked their way up to the point where they each receive seeds at Grand Slam tournaments. Although Kyrgios lost his third round match Friday, Tomic has an opportunity to set up a Round of 16 showdown with Andy Murray. Both players looked up to Lleyton Hewitt for the past decade, and now it’s their turn to be the face of men’s tennis in Australia.

That’s the impact of Lleyton Hewitt. Fans worldwide thank him for the memories.

All-star games in professional sports leagues are tricky to begin with; one of the key criticisms being that if a game is held mid-season, there’s a chance that a star player will be injured, which would impact his team’s playoff chances. This year, the NHL is attracting controversy to its All-Star Game for a different reason.

The big story this season is the Arizona Coyotes’ John Scott being selected to play in the game. As this SB Nation article explains, Scott isn’t a household name among most NHL fans, so partially out of a desire to annoy NHL executives, they selected Scott to serve as one of the captains. The controversy took a new twist when the veteran learned on Friday he would be not only be traded to the Montreal Canadiens, but his new club assigned him to their AHL affiliate, making him ineligible for the All-Star Game.

However, the news earlier this week was that Scott would have his ASG eligibility re-instated, meaning he will be captains for one of the teams. Going back to the SB nation article, originally he shared executives’ lack of enthusiasm for the idea, but slowly warmed up to being an All Star, and getting a chance to realize that will be a unique opportunity for him and his family.

The whole situation brings this question to light: are All Star Games nothing more than popularity contests? Had John Scott already been a household name among hockey fans, the NHL would not have had a problem with the result, as it was their idea to have a fan vote. The league has been trying to promote itself to new fans with promising ideas, but their initial action to disregard the fan vote puts a severe limit on the amount of credibility they could’ve gained. If something like this happens next year, how will the NHL react to that occurrence?

The NHL All-Star Weekend will be held the final weekend of January in Nashville. Instead of one traditional game, each of the four divisions will have an 11-man roster, competing in 3-on-3 games to determine which division wins the ASG Final. Scott, having been on the Coyotes’ roster during the fan vote, will captain the Pacific Division.

In any collegiate sport, being the top-ranked team in the country means a lot of pressure to perform well. That pressure is easily evident in college basketball, where several teams are ranked #1 throughout a year; some reach that ranking multiple times in the same season.

Monday saw Oklahoma receive the #1 ranking in both major Division I basketball polls following a Kansas loss the previous week. The Sooners fell that evening at Iowa State, the third time this season a top-ranked has lost in Iowa. Earlier in the year, Northern Iowa stunned North Carolina, followed by Iowa edging Michigan State in a Big Ten rivalry. The Sooners came into Monday’s game with the Cyclones off a tough home win over West Virginia; had the Mountaineers won in Norman, WVU would’ve had a legitimate argument to be ranked #1. Now a new #1 will be announced next Monday, with all eyes focused on whether or not that team can stay atop the rankings for more than a week.

Monday also saw a major upset in Division II basketball as Concord upset the top-ranked team, West Liberty. The Hilltoppers have been the standard-bearer of the Mountain East Conference, but the Mountain Lions enjoyed a quick start against WLU in Athens, West Virginia. The Hilltoppers did rally to go into halftime on top, but Concord rallied for a 108-93 win that will mean a new top-ranked team in Division II next week. It could also prove to be a pivotal step for Concord, who just missed out on a berth in last year’s Division II Tournament; this might be the spark leading to a run that puts the Mountain Lions in this year’s tournament.

The story of rotating top-ranked teams is a drastic change from the main plot line of the 2014-15 basketball season; would Kentucky be able to go undefeated throughout an entire season? As it turned out, that wouldn’t be the case, but it was a fun story for neutrals to follow. This season, the story is the supposed “curse” of being #1, as the sport is now two months away from March Madness. How many more top-ranked teams will fall between now and March?